Supersahen 61 Posted April 20, 2018 44 minutes ago, Drew said: Dshkm, can turn it to Swiss cheese killing driver and all passengers, spg-9 roast it with a couple rounds, AGS-30 grenade spam will kill the tires and then leave it/them out in the open for target practice. Yeah but in my whole 75 hours in the server i've seen 1 spg, 1 Military offroad with an AGS-30, and i've seen like 3 DSHKM's. No one actually uses this stuff and it can be easily dispatched with a 5.56 rifle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xpoqx 5 Posted April 20, 2018 I imagine the open configuration of the vehicles crew postions, particularly the weapon mounting positions and lack of armor precludes most players from purchasing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Drew 27 Posted April 20, 2018 26 minutes ago, Supersahen said: Yeah but in my whole 75 hours in the server i've seen 1 spg, 1 Military offroad with an AGS-30, and i've seen like 3 DSHKM's. No one actually uses this stuff and it can be easily dispatched with a 5.56 rifle. Well because most only use bikes and fals, speaking of, I think fal rounds can go through the armour. But if they managed to get one into blufor territory, a simple ambush on a patrol route would suffice. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Elijah 91 Posted April 20, 2018 One point made in this topic is that rockets should only be used on armored vehicles. I would like to make a post dedicated to this topic but since it is allready posted here I would like to voice my opinion of the matter. I believe that rockets should ONLY be used on armored and armed vehicles. There is no need to use rockets on unarmored vehicle and especially civilians that are in no vehicle at all. I believe indeps are the only ones who should be allowed to use rockets on whatever they want because they don't have laws or politics that they need to work around. However Blufor/NATO is a peace keeping organization that would have international politics and humane guidelines to stick to. For example, If NATO uses rockets to blow up criminals such as bank robbers the international effects would be extreamily political and I believe that NATO would face serious reprucutions. For opfor I don't know about real world examples especially since they are supposed to be corrupt but at the very least it would still harm Russia's relations with the rest of the world. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xpoqx 5 Posted April 20, 2018 21 minutes ago, Elijah said: One point made in this topic is that rockets should only be used on armored vehicles. I would like to make a post dedicated to this topic but since it is allready posted here I would like to voice my opinion of the matter. I believe that rockets should ONLY be used on armored and armed vehicles. There is no need to use rockets on unarmored vehicle and especially civilians that are in no vehicle at all. I believe indeps are the only ones who should be allowed to use rockets on whatever they want because they don't have laws or politics that they need to work around. However Blufor/NATO is a peace keeping organization that would have international politics and humane guidelines to stick to. For example, If NATO uses rockets to blow up criminals such as bank robbers the international effects would be extreamily political and I believe that NATO would face serious reprucutions. For opfor I don't know about real world examples especially since they are supposed to be corrupt but at the very least it would still harm Russia's relations with the rest of the world. please say it a little louder for dudes in back, no rockets on unarmed, unarmored vehicles, shit makes for the worst player experience. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Supersahen 61 Posted April 20, 2018 +1 for the no rockets on unarmed, unarmoured vehicles. I can't fathom how anyone thinks its OK to just Hydra the bank to kill a civ with a glock. Or to Hydra a fleeing SUV/motorbike 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
