-
Content count
34 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Everything posted by LordWookie
-
I'm going to remain neutral solely because I've not had much experience with him on this server. However, in the past I've had both good and bad experiences with him. He's a nice guy to play with, can generate RP and is normally pretty level headed, but I also remember him not exactly knowing the rules and frequently trying to bend them to get out of them. If he's improved since then though, I do feel he could be a good addition to the staff team.
-
I think you need to find the caps lock key and press it. Thanks!
-
speed up the op-for de-arming process
LordWookie replied to krieger's topic in Suggestions & Feedback
Yes it does, you have to get into the gunner seat. Fly off the map, land, rearm, problem solved. I've done it a lot before myself. Hell L-39 can do it mid air. -
speed up the op-for de-arming process
LordWookie replied to krieger's topic in Suggestions & Feedback
To be fair, all an MI-24 needs is an AI and a brain cell and you won't shoot him down. Carry vehicle ammo, fuel cans, you don't even need to go back to base to rearm. -
Firstly, the biggest desert in the world has quite a large amount of snow and Ice. It's called Antarctica. Also a lot of actual deserts get snow. In fact they get a lot more snow than rain. Also, you are aware half the world is now approaching winter correct?
-
Well of course. But now you're trying to blackmail to get unbanned. But of course you know more than myself, Gio or any of the staff. Why would you know which of your friends are helping you after all?
-
Just for your maturity on this matter, as well as the fact it seems you're getting more active on the website I'll no upgrade my vote too a: +1 .o/
-
If the BMP-3 isn't enough it's a learn to play issue and the issue is simply that you're bad. You're trying to operate a vehicle that should have multiple crew members alone. That's your first mistake. Tanks arn't made to be solo crewed. Stop trying to make them so. The M-47 Dragon is Indeps only reliable AT weapon against heavy armour.
-
You are aware the smoke from the commander seat is IR smoke which defeats the missiles right? You are aware you can use your thermals, and other infantry around your vehicle to protect your position right...? I'm very much aware of what the launcher is capable off. I used it a lot when I played Indep and I also used the BMP-3 a lot when I was OPFOR.
-
The M-47 dragon, is not only a realistic weapon for such a force but it isn't even that good. You shouldn't be operating an armoured vehicle alone. Patrol, provide cover. You have some of the best weapon systems available to you. If you're unable to protect a BMP from a dragon, you don't deserve to have said BMP. Actual terrorist organisations have huge stockpiles of ATGMs, as they are extremely common such as this Iraq, M1 Abrams being hit by a Konkurs ATGM causing an ammo cook off.
-
Oh? Well... See you when you're back! .o/
-
I don't exactly have any experience with London, but it seems although some people have good experience others have bad. My suggestion would be to be active on the website in game and team speaks, play with people and put the past behind you! If I see you're active and dedicated, I'd have no issue supporting you! \o/
-
Oh? May be different too the one I remember.
-
Not for targeting a direct area, and if it's the one I'm thinking of wasn't that locked to Owners by Lex and didn't it cause huge lag?
-
This was going so well.... Until you put that picture at the bottom for no reason.
-
You are aware, that'd actually require players to download a mod? Also... You are aware the SCUD launchers minimum range is larger than the map of Takistan right....?
-
You've shown no respect to the staff, and it seems you're also lying to the staff here. For that reason alone, I'm inclined to say -1 But not only that, it's clear you then attempted to avoid your ban. At this point, I don't think you're somebody who should play in this community unless you drastically mature.
-
+1 potato
-
Normally you shouldn't be banned for that. What ever staff banned you needs talking too. You should have been warned and an admin should have then comped the other player what he lost. HOWEVER. You should never leave during a help room issue. Should you be perm banned? No. Should you even be banned now? I'd argue yes, because you left. However, not for as long as you were banned. And whatever staff member dealt with you in the help room needs talking too.
-
stop punishing players for staff disrespect
LordWookie replied to Hink's topic in Suggestions & Feedback
Okay cool. However, on this server we aim to keep it an enjoyable community that people can enjoy. If you're upset you can't insult people for giving up their time to help run this place then what ever... I don't see you giving your time to help better the community, while constantly being insulted, belittled etc. -
stop punishing players for staff disrespect
LordWookie replied to Hink's topic in Suggestions & Feedback
You've had one. I retired from staff for a few reasons. But, the point still stands. If you have such an issue with playing here under our rules around staff disrespect you don't have to play here. Have you even played on this server? It seems like you're here as a troll attempting to create drama. If that's an issue with a staff member, they shouldn't be staff and should be reported for such a thing. It's immature to start throwing insults around when something doesn't go your way. Staff are here to make the experience for everybody better, not deal with you when you throw your toys out the pram. -
stop punishing players for staff disrespect
LordWookie replied to Hink's topic in Suggestions & Feedback
Staff Disrespect is against the rules. If you have an issue, that's fine. You don't have to play here! Staff here are volunteers and are here to make the place a better place for us all and don't have to deal with you being a bitch to them because you're upset and have no maturity. -
Honestly, I'd 100% say if you were to use it as an insult, yes. The same as if you were to say the N word. But honestly, people cry on teamspeak about everything constantly.
-
That's fair, but if you start throwing it as an insult to random people etc, then you should be banned for it.
-
Okay, no. If you or anybody else called somebody a "faggot" they deserve to be banned for homophobia, just the same as racism should be a ban. There's simply no need to create a toxic, insulting environment. However I do agree, "being afraid of getting banned for stating an opinion" is a huge issue that needs to be addressed. Also, I've not really seen any reports about staff? I may have missed it though.
