JumpyWizard

13 hours ago, SlimBone said:

I was the last ever to not make the staff application on the forums here

Can we accept him for the meme

43 minutes ago, Abdullah Al Arganeen said:

Yeah, it was quite a long time ago, playing on tlx, but I still and always felt like SOME of the staff members are allowed to do more without proper punishment, but maybe its due to lack  online Admins on ts3/tlx, because the mods cant punish guys with same or higher rank

I'm here to make sure they don't.

Reason for staff maybe being allowed to do more, is because we don't hand out strikes to them, as easy as we do to players. Staff still have to comp if they did something wrong. But any issues with staff, we do it internally.

2 minutes ago, Pearse said:

-1 The playtime is a complete lie, you have been here shorter than i have and i've played for 3 months max on this server

He has played for over 100 hours and was first seen 3-4 months ago.

No. -1. You are not staff material in my eyes. Sorry, Cracky. You are immature, which there is nothing wrong with, but you simply lack situational awareness. Also, fix your date of birth

One thing is that you're not old enough, exceptions can and has been made in the past, however, you don't have enough forum reputation either.

The official Takistani currency needs to be renamed to Shekels. It looks good and gives a nostalgic feeling, will also make roleplaying easier

13 hours ago, JUDGE said:

Allllriiiight this isn't destructive criticism for Gen Richotvz thread, we should tone it down and let jumpy have his wholesome thread

Thanks babe

we need everyone to stop saying server is dead and to just join it. ez fix

On 6/18/2018 at 4:27 AM, JumpyWizard said:

this isn't going to be a post of pure pointless arguing, that will make me very sad

 

 

Read this. I will happily continue it in discord, but pls don't do this to my wholesome post

1 minute ago, Gen Richotvz said:

You dont need to prove anything, your correct. Now, if he made a report saying he didnt admit and he was falsely accused. Are you properly prepared to counter his argument with evidence? Video/recording of conversation etc.

I am fairly sure he did make a report. And no I wouldn't be but my question is then: Would he be?

1 minute ago, Gen Richotvz said:

Perfect, calculated response. I was hoping you would say something along those lines, Id love to believe you. But like in the support room. I cant believe you until there is proof/evidence. Just because your reputation is high, doesnt mean you dont need proof  Obtaining a screenshot of him admitting, or anything would be helpful to understand the situation.

I am simply saying it from my point of view. You might ask him, of course, he might deny it, but that's life and quite frankly, I don't really need to prove anything towards you or Randy.

1 hour ago, Gen Richotvz said:

You know nothing because you played for a week, staff biased is in favor in some people and against some people, just because of there name and there relationship with them.

You are literally always complaining. We try not to be biased, but you certainly don't help to stay unbiased.

59 minutes ago, Gen Richotvz said:

Notice jumpywizard disliked your comment, meaning, he read it, but doesnt understand the issue and thus nothing will happen Fragmend. I see how its bs, you were called 10x worse and he didn't receive a punishment. The reason for that is being he is friends with the staff, and the staff will not punish friends as heavily as they would. I sit in the same boat as you my friend, staff are unequal.

I disliked it due to me not wanting to start a fucking fight, which I even specified in the post. Reason for him not actually receiving punishment was not due to me being friends with the other guy, it was due to Randy/Fragmented being provocative as shit. He even admitted it to me and the other person in the support room, but does he mention that? Nah because it isn't fun to realize you're wrong.

Next time you want to act all cool and write an essay, make sure you get your facts straight. You weren't even in the help room my guy.

13 hours ago, Fragmented said:

Staff in support rooms are biased, why wouldnt they be in a staff report?

Not exactly sure what you mean. If you're talking about staff complaints, then only the management are able to see them and will bring individual cases up with none other than the staff member that it is about.

CASE SUMMARY

[Accused Party] : Omega (CIV)

[Accusing Party] :  MrImperfection (BluFor)

[Issue Summary] : MrImperfection was shooting at Omega, who was in a helicopter, Omega crashed intentionally into MrImperfection

[Witnesses/Testimony] :  N/A

[Additional Evidence] :

[Additional Notes] : Admitted to kamikaze

ACTION

[Player Name] : Omega

[BattlEye GUID] : f1c437320bd1ecd3dffafedcd0c6939c

[IP Address] : 2.15.61.120

[Action Taken] : 2 day ban for fail ts and kamikaze

24 minutes ago, SlingShot said:

I Think most opfor vehicles would be classed martial law and war vehicles anyway. If people use common sense this wouldnt be an issue

 

It just shows people don't since it happens, worst part is, it's usually staff/friends of staff doing so

5 hours ago, Pearse said:

*Buys L39 from opfor* *Starts thread on why blufor shouldn't buy L39's from opfor*

I was indie?

CASE SUMMARY

[Accused Party] : Ponyashka

[Accusing Party] :  Me

[Issue Summary] : During today's hacker attack, he was a suspected hacker and did look quite fishy. First time on the server and Russian with a private account, like the 2 other accounts that were banned for hacking earlier. I witnessed him running around in a very remote area, with items spawning close to him.

[Witnesses/Testimony] : N/A

[Additional Evidence] : N/A

[Additional Notes] : Not 100% sure it was him, which is why I wrote 'suspected'

ACTION

[Player Name] : Ponyashka

[BattlEye GUID] : d6760b09a23363786c23f5629ec22681

[IP Address] : 46.72.2.133

[Action Taken] :

[✓/] Ban

  Length of Ban: Suspected hacking, perm

32 minutes ago, Kane said:

Sometimes we have a “The enemy of my enemy is my friend” with blufor when the indeps are being a bigger problem than usual, which is why we do what we do

You know.. Martial law?

13 minutes ago, Kane said:

Well, thats why we charge so much for vics, Its to help the blufor fight off thoes indeps and civlians, you know, makes people do legal stuff? I know it sounds boring but its what nato would do in a situation like that, I dont want to make killing blufor a easy jobe so we let them buy stuff so they can have a better chance, Nothing like a little brdm ATGM cant fix

But in what roleplay way does NATO forces purchasing vehicles from OpFor, a faction they forever hate and always have problems with?

Good evening, everyone!

I feel some changes need to be made for BluFor's, currently, BluFor is allowed to purchase weapons, tanks, and helicopters from OpFor, which in my opinion should be deemed fail RP to do so.

Why is it fail RP though?

It ruins it for other players. Imagine being an indie with a little Fal running around on the road, and suddenly a hind comes along and blows you up, does that seem fair to you guys? Also, imagine this; You're a civilian in need of quick and easy cash, you decide to rob the gas station, out of nowhere a T-72 pulls up and tells you to drop your shit. You can't run and you definitely can't fight it. Which just ruins that civilians will to play, since he can't do anything about a T-72

It isn't the only thing that needs changing

It is roughly in the same category as the previous, however, it is with Independent vehicles. If Blufor successfully kills an Independent player and that player is in an armored vehicle, well now the BluFor player has a new vehicle to play with. Might argue that it could potentially fall under the rule of corruption, or fail RP, but I feel as there needs to be a specific rule stating BluFor can't use Independent vehicles.

It simply adds fuel to the fire

The debate about BluFor not doing anything but being inside Strykers is an evergoing discussion, but personally, I would much rather fight a BluFor in a tin can with an M2 strapped on top, than the finest Communist tank money can buy, the oh so beautiful T-72.

I hope that at least one of those rules, hopefully, both will be added to the rules as soon as possible, as it both ruins the fun for others, makes people quit and overall doesn't match the roleplay scenario of a NATO-like military force.

Wizard, Yeehaw.

6 hours ago, Giovanni said:

Remember that this post is about providing constructive criticism for the staff team so let's try to keep it on topic as such. If you have a specific issue that requires attention, that's what staff complaints are for.

Thanks Gio

2 hours ago, Lt. Col. Stryder said:

Yeah, I was in a support room and a staff member (Not saying who) allowed the two other people shit talk and talk over me and when I did it (talk over) he took away my talk privilege. Not a lot of staff members are biased but everyone is biased in some way so I am not sure. If you can find someone being unfair simply record the support case I always do that since I am not playing cause of what I just previously stated.

That's what we have staff complaints for , Stryder.

But I can see as to why it may annoy you, and it shouldn't have happened in the first place.

Adding a yes or no button would be good. The reason the feature is there is for the RP situations that you can create.

1 minute ago, Abdullah Al Arganeen said:

lmao just got shot by 3 different guys  2 days ago when i robbed a bank, leaving my weapon inside. Also i wasnt even seen by anyone inside, so blufor is just KOSing people who are suspects unfortunately.

If they saw you with a weapon, then they can shoot you on sight, since you might have a concealed weapon. Now for them shooting you there, I disagree with it and I would've definitely handed out warnings if I was dealing with the situation.